|
Post by overlord on Aug 1, 2008 12:43:53 GMT -5
Imagine paying people ---in a society without money?? Imagine living well, in a society where there is no business incentive to force you to work, and no government incentive to force you to work either? Methinks everyone would starve. How would that work?
|
|
|
Post by redanarchist on Aug 1, 2008 13:37:59 GMT -5
These questions have been answered time and time and time again. There are probably thousands of of forum threads online and books online which could easily give you this information, so why do you insist on asking for it again and again?
|
|
|
Post by Comrade Rage on Aug 1, 2008 13:41:11 GMT -5
so why do you insist on asking for it again and again? Probably because he has an IQ of 12.
|
|
|
Post by overlord on Aug 2, 2008 1:02:25 GMT -5
These questions have been answered time and time and time again. There are probably thousands of of forum threads online and books online which could easily give you this information, so why do you insist on asking for it again and again? can't answer my legitimate concerns huh? I'll tell you why, it's cos there is no answer. communism/socialism can of course `work', just not very well compared to capitalism.
|
|
|
Post by overlord on Aug 2, 2008 1:03:34 GMT -5
so why do you insist on asking for it again and again? Probably because he has an IQ of 12. you left out a zero, mr brickhead, lol.
|
|
|
Post by awfulreality on Aug 3, 2008 1:13:05 GMT -5
Imagine paying people ---in a society without money?? Actually, standard marxist theory holds that money would existing the form of a labor unit, an amount of money given to a worker based on the amount of value produced. There are many advantages to this, which I can further name if you'd like. As a westerner most likely living in the US, I will concede such a place is hard to imagine. However, it has existed, and worked well too. Methinks you should look at capitalism's record first Want me to go in-depth?
|
|
|
Post by overlord on Aug 3, 2008 1:56:52 GMT -5
who determines value? you need a cash system to determine value, otherwise, some ballet dancer will say a boxing film is shit. where lol? bs. much more people die in socialist work camps than capitalist factories. if you did, it would sound like you were making it up as you go along. i know for a fact communists don't have any theroy on how it works. i asked stacks of times on revleft and never got a suitable answer. i know it, you know it, let's drop this silly pretence.
|
|
|
Post by awfulreality on Aug 3, 2008 8:35:24 GMT -5
The nationalized retailers. Here's how. Capitalism: "That Stereo is $75. The worker got $4.50 to make that." Socialism: "That Stereo is $75. The worker got an amount corresponding not to retail, or price-value, but according to the amount of labor necessary for him to take part in the manufacture of that Stereo."
Ballerina: "That film about Muhammad Ali is shit." Central Committee: "OH NOEZ MAH ECONOMY! NOES NOES NOES!" USSR, 1924-1956
Refuting the childish arguments on revleft is not hard. It is a forum of Trots and Anarchists.
|
|
|
Post by overlord on Aug 3, 2008 11:37:54 GMT -5
The nationalized retailers. Here's how. Capitalism: "That Stereo is $75. The worker got $4.50 to make that." Socialism: "That Stereo is $75. The worker got an amount corresponding not to retail, or price-value, but according to the amount of labor necessary for him to take part in the manufacture of that Stereo." Ballerina: "That film about Muhammad Ali is shit." Central Committee: "OH NOEZ MAH ECONOMY! NOES NOES NOES!" USSR, 1924-1956 Refuting the childish arguments on revleft is not hard. It is a forum of Trots and Anarchists. I'll admit it works, slightly, in theaory, but try putting it into practice. Then we'll seperate the cows from the goats.
|
|
|
Post by ulstersocialist on Aug 4, 2008 16:38:24 GMT -5
Probably because he has an IQ of 12. you left out a zero, mr brickhead, lol. yeah, at the beginning. -> 0.12 ;D
|
|
|
Post by overlord on Aug 5, 2008 0:19:37 GMT -5
you left out a zero, mr brickhead, lol. yeah, at the beginning. -> 0.12 ;D yeah, cos it was so high it went off the scale and wrapped around lol.
|
|
|
Post by ulstersocialist on Aug 5, 2008 15:28:40 GMT -5
yeah, at the beginning. -> 0.12 ;D yeah, cos it was so high it went off the scale and wrapped around lol. obviously you sat at the back of the class during mathematics.
|
|
|
Post by overlord on Aug 5, 2008 20:25:41 GMT -5
yeah, cos it was so high it went off the scale and wrapped around lol. obviously you sat at the back of the class during mathematics. i did math at college. that's above ur level.
|
|
|
Post by ulstersocialist on Aug 8, 2008 9:25:46 GMT -5
obviously you sat at the back of the class during mathematics. i did math at college. that's above ur level. how do you know what my level is? You're clearly not that adept when you don't understand something as rudimentary as significant figures.
|
|
|
Post by solzhenitsyn08 on Oct 17, 2008 16:23:47 GMT -5
PROF. MES-TURKISH SOLZHENITSYN (BLESS THE HOLLY MISSION FROM ALEXANDRE S. TO M. E. SURAT) TURNED INTO AN INTERNATIONAL FIGURE AND NOW TALKS TO THE WORLD’S INTELLECTUALS
HERE YOU ARE THE PITIFUL PAWN OF THE SECOND SOVIET: THE FAKE CHIEF OF GENERAL STAFF "Why is he yelping at TARAF GAZETTE?” Because it is a Pro-West Newspaper! “Why does he support SECRETLY The MESAJ TV?” Because it is the media organ of Turkish Al-Qaida!
HERE IS THE SWINDLER-PHONY PM, OF THE SECOND SOVIET!
"Why is he ALSO yelping at TARAF GAZETTE?” Because it is a Pro-West Newspaper! “Why does he OVERTLY support The MESAJ TV?” Because it is the media organ of Turkish Al-Qaida!
REMEMBER: THE SECOND SOVIET IS THE SWORN ENEMY OF THE USA AND ITS ALLIES!
|
|