|
|
Post by overlord on Aug 1, 2008 12:08:15 GMT -5
Hello, a few years ago i was unceremoniously, nay, cowardly, banned from revleft, by an ultra-left faction, hell-bent on removing me.
I recall with affection, Capitalist lawyer, theraven, generalpatton, ummprofesional, Tungsten, Redstar200, etc, and many other entertaining personalities, the most interesting of whom, you invariably banned, as you, quite naturally, couldn't take the pressure.
Following your site, i noticed you had invaded this place, and there don't seem to be many anti communists around here, sooooo you wanna talk to a real capitalist, here i am!
|
|
|
|
Post by redanarchist on Aug 1, 2008 12:21:24 GMT -5
Who were you when you were at RevLeft?
|
|
|
|
Post by overlord on Aug 1, 2008 12:31:27 GMT -5
Who were you when you were at RevLeft? I was `overlord' lol! |
|
|
|
Post by redanarchist on Aug 1, 2008 12:39:58 GMT -5
I can't remember you. If you were there a few years ago I was probably xphile2868 at the time, or maybe Makhno or ThisAnarchistKillsNazis.
|
|
|
|
Post by redanarchist on Aug 1, 2008 12:41:39 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by joe on Aug 1, 2008 12:51:41 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by ulstersocialist on Aug 1, 2008 16:45:20 GMT -5
Hello, a few years ago i was unceremoniously, nay, cowardly, banned from revleft, by an ultra-left faction, hell-bent on removing me. I recall with affection, Capitalist lawyer, theraven, generalpatton, ummprofesional, Tungsten, Redstar200, etc, and many other entertaining personalities, the most interesting of whom, you invariably banned, as you, quite naturally, couldn't take the pressure. Following your site, i noticed you had invaded this place, and there don't seem to be many anti communists around here, sooooo you wanna talk to a real capitalist, here i am! if you were banned it was more than likely for a good reason. We don't tolerate trolls, racists, homophobes or religious nutjobs. |
|
|
|
Post by overlord on Aug 2, 2008 1:06:41 GMT -5
It was legitimate, cos it adressed the fact that the only successful regimes purporting to be communist were in fact totalitarian. -- something you people have trouble with. ;D |
|
|
|
Post by ulstersocialist on Aug 2, 2008 6:30:24 GMT -5
It was legitimate, cos it adressed the fact that the only successful regimes purporting to be communist were in fact totalitarian. -- something you people have trouble with. ;D not that we have trouble with, its more we're sick of debunking the same old tired reguritated nonsense over and over again. totalitarian states were a product of their external material circumstances, nothing to do with a ideaological fault within communism. |
|
|
|
Post by overlord on Aug 2, 2008 10:01:54 GMT -5
It was legitimate, cos it adressed the fact that the only successful regimes purporting to be communist were in fact totalitarian. -- something you people have trouble with. ;D not that we have trouble with, its more we're sick of debunking the same old tired reguritated nonsense over and over again. totalitarian states were a product of their external material circumstances, nothing to do with a ideaological fault within communism. And if i keep melting lead to try and get gold, this has nothing to do with an idealogical fault within alchemy? |
|
|
|
Post by joe on Aug 3, 2008 7:15:53 GMT -5
Anarchist catolona did not turn into a authoritarian area.
|
|
|
|
Post by overlord on Aug 3, 2008 11:36:42 GMT -5
Anarchist catolona did not turn into a authoritarian area. yeah, but i heard that the people running the place demanded butt-sex from the republican government. |
|
|
|
Post by redanarchist on Aug 3, 2008 12:58:16 GMT -5
Anarchist catolona did not turn into a authoritarian area. yeah, but i heard that the people running the place demanded butt-sex from the republican government. Anal sex? Thats your response? Should we not even bother debating with you, because its pretty obvious that you're an idiot. |
|
|
|
Post by overlord on Aug 3, 2008 16:23:05 GMT -5
yeah, but i heard that the people running the place demanded butt-sex from the republican government. Anal sex? Thats your response? Should we not even bother debating with you, because its pretty obvious that you're an idiot. I hear the butt-sex was without any lube, as the anarchists decided that was a decadant bourgoise convenience. |
|
|
|
Post by redanarchist on Aug 3, 2008 17:13:18 GMT -5
Anal sex? Thats your response? Should we not even bother debating with you, because its pretty obvious that you're an idiot. I hear the butt-sex was without any lube, as the anarchists decided that was a decadant bourgoise convenience. As the bourgoisie at the time in Spain were very conservative, I doubt that they were using lube very much, so there goes that stupid argument. |
|
